Description

How many times have you had a trial witness outright lie? How many times have you experienced a GBI analyst overstate their conclusion or downplay a finding excluding your client as a DNA contributor? How many times have you had a witness dance around a direct question and, instead, shade the truth to favor the prosecution? 

Join Christina Cribbs and Veronica O'Grady as they arm you with the knowledge to force the prosecution to present the unadorned truth to the jury, through Glossip v. Oklahoma, 604 U.S. 226 (2025). This is the first SCOTUS case in decades to clarify the State’s obligations under Napue, which established that the State violates the defendant’s Due Process rights when it knowingly allows any false testimony to be presented at trial. Understanding Glossip, and the case law that precedes it, will empower appellate and trial lawyers alike to stop the State from letting witnesses lie, mislead, or avoid admitting the truth.