BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//ChamberMaster//Event Calendar 2.0//EN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:P1H
REFRESH-INTERVAL:P1H
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
DTSTART:20070101T000000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:Eastern Daylight Time
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
DTSTART:20070101T000000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:Eastern Standard Time
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260514T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260514T140000
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
SUMMARY:GACDL Lunch + Learn Series | Forcing the Truth: Confronting False Testimony After Glossip v. Oklahoma
DESCRIPTION:How many times have you had a trial witness outright lie? How many times have you experienced a GBI analyst overstate their conclusion or downplay a finding excluding your client as a DNA contributor? How many times have you had a witness dance around a direct question and\, instead\, shade the truth to favor the prosecution? Join Christina Cribbs and Veronica O'Grady as they arm you with the knowledge to force the prosecution to present the unadorned truth to the jury\, through Glossip v. Oklahoma\, 604 U.S. 226 (2025). This is the first SCOTUS case in decades to clarify the State's obligations under Napue\, which established that the State violates the defendant's Due Process rights when it knowingly allows any false testimony to be presented at trial. Understanding Glossip\, and the case law that precedes it\, will empower appellate and trial lawyers alike to stop the State from letting witnesses lie\, mislead\, or avoid admitting the truth.
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:
How many times have you had a trial witness outright lie? How many times have you experienced a GBI analyst overstate their conclusion or downplay a finding excluding your client as a DNA contributor? How many times have you had a witness dance around a direct question and\, instead\, shade the truth to favor the prosecution? \;
\;
Join \;Christina Cribbs and \;Veronica O'\;Grady as they arm you with the knowledge to force the prosecution to present the unadorned truth to the jury\, through \;Glossip v. Oklahoma\, 604 U.S. 226 (2025). This is the first SCOTUS case in decades to clarify the State&rsquo\;s obligations under Napue\, which established that the State violates the defendant&rsquo\;s Due Process rights when it knowingly allows any false testimony to be presented at trial. Understanding \;Glossip\, and the case law that precedes it\, will empower appellate and trial lawyers alike to stop the State from letting witnesses lie\, mislead\, or avoid admitting the truth.
LOCATION:
UID:e.4181.1458185
SEQUENCE:3
DTSTAMP:20260512T205241Z
URL:https://members.gacdl.org/event-list/Details/gacdl-lunch-learn-series-forcing-the-truth-confronting-false-testimony-after-glossip-v-oklahoma-1684181?sourceTypeId=Hub
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR